What if your next drivers were Chinese robots?
11 February 2025
With its new autopilot technology targeting its entire product line, BYD sends a message to the world: Chinese technology can no longer be ignored.
Bottom line
BYD's autonomous driving system appears to be at least on par with state-of-the-art technology from European and U.S. carmakers. By targeting mass availability, the company shows its system is, however, much more cost-efficient and optimized, making its large-scale adoption only a matter of time. After the DeepSeek breakthrough, this is another reminder that Chinese players cannot be ignored when it comes to technological innovation, supporting our long-term conviction that Chinese stocks cannot be absent from a technology portfolio.
What happened
On 10 February, BYD unveiled its "God's Eye" advanced driving assistance system (ADAS), something competitor Tesla improperly markets as an "autopilot". The system will feature three different tiers:
- The entry-level (God's Eye variant C) relies on 12 cameras and 17 radar sensors. Available on all BYD-branded vehicles, including the CNY70'000 Seagull, it will work only on highways.
- The mid-level (variant B) integrates also one lidar sensor and will enable city driving. It will be mostly available on premium brands Denza and Fang Cheng Bao.
- The top level (variant A) will be available for BYD's luxury Yangwang brand. It integrates 3 lidar sensors on top of the cameras and radar sensors, and comes with significant more computing power.
Each variant will be powered by an architecture called "Xuanji", featuring a common arrangement of hardware, both cloud and local AI capabilities, networking, data capture, sensors, and actuation systems. This architecture will connect to DeepSeek R1 to improve its capabilities, demonstrating the intrications and the power of the Chinese tech ecosystem.
Impact on our Investment Case
China tech strikes again
Only a few weeks after the DeepSeek announcement, which sent shockwaves through the AI hardware ecosystem, China strikes again and surprises the world. BYD’s founder notably claimed that the system was able to achieve over 1’000 kilometers of autonomous driving without human intervention, as well as a 99% success rate when used to park autonomously. These claims will, of course, need to be verified by independent testing, but are, on paper, quite impressive. Even more impressive is the claim that the mid and top tiers can drive in cities, something that the current state-of-the-art system, deployed by Mercedes Benz Group, cannot do, being limited to level 3 assistance (conditional automation, i.e., the driver must be able to assume control when prompted) on highways.
Efficiency as the mother of all battles
As with DeepSeek, the major breakthrough is materialized by the large cost optimization compared to cutting-edge solutions developed in Western economies. As mentioned above, the state-of-the-art technology available to consumers is sold by a premium carmaker, Mercedes. If BYD’s claims are verified, an entry-level car would be able to match these capabilities, which is an impressive feat.
Self-proclaimed autonomous driving champion, Tesla, is miles behind. Its technology is limited to level 2 autonomy, i.e., it requires the driver’s constant vigilance and attention. More importantly, the company is desperately trying to reduce the cost of its system, going as far as cutting all sensors but cameras – to not much avail, since the latest earnings showed that gross margins seemed to have found a ceiling.
Although BYD’s technology may suffer from the same kind of problems on entry-level vehicles, it managed to pack an impressive amount of hardware on a tight budget and appears to have beaten Tesla at its own game. In this regard, both BYD and Tesla’s valuations will probably have to adjust to reflect this new reality, which might prove unpleasant for the latter’s shareholders.
Fighting on all fronts
Tesla is trying to find solace out of the consumer market, having largely focused the narrative on its incoming robotaxis. However, the company is facing the presence of Alphabet’s Waymo, which has been steadily developing its technology for over a decade and has already launched commercial services in some major cities (e.g., Los Angeles, San Francisco).
Furthermore, another Chinese heavyweight has also been playing the long game in this segment: Baidu. The company has been steadily developing similar services in China on top of its Apollo platform, and is following the familiar cost-optimization playbook, with its sixth generation of robotaxi reportedly costing CNY200’000, i.e., less than the public price of Waymo’s vehicles before the costly modifications necessary to enable autonomous driving features.
Our Takeaway
Geopolitical games will probably prevent BYD and Baidu from becoming successful in the U.S. But both companies have demonstrated the use of a common playbook to achieve technology breakthroughs that may enable commercial dominance in the rest of the world. At the very least, the Chinese technology ecosystem can no longer be ignored. Our lasting conviction is that it is clearly underestimated and undervalued, offering an appealing investment opportunity. Chinese equities account for an average of ~8% across our strategies, with a peak at ~30% for our Sustainable Future strategy. BYD and Baidu are, respectively, long-term holdings of our Sustainable Future and AI & Robotics strategies. BYD also takes a prominent place in our latest China-focused strategy, which aims to capitalize on this conviction fully by replicating a proprietary Chinese technology index leveraging our knowledge in the field and our investment process.
Companies mentioned in this article
Alphabet (GOOGL); BYD (1211); Baidu (BIDU); DeepSeek (Not listed); Mercedes Benz Group (MBG); Tesla (TSLA)
Explore:
Disclaimer
This report has been produced by the organizational unit responsible for investment research (Research unit) of atonra Partners and sent to you by the company sales representatives.
As an internationally active company, atonra Partners SA may be subject to a number of provisions in drawing up and distributing its investment research documents. These regulations include the Directives on the Independence of Financial Research issued by the Swiss Bankers Association. Although atonra Partners SA believes that the information provided in this document is based on reliable sources, it cannot assume responsibility for the quality, correctness, timeliness or completeness of the information contained in this report.
The information contained in these publications is exclusively intended for a client base consisting of professionals or qualified investors. It is sent to you by way of information and cannot be divulged to a third party without the prior consent of atonra Partners. While all reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information contained is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such.
Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future results. Investment losses may occur, and investors could lose some or all of their investment. Any indices cited herein are provided only as examples of general market performance and no index is directly comparable to the past or future performance of the Certificate.
It should not be assumed that the Certificate will invest in any specific securities that comprise any index, nor should it be understood to mean that there is a correlation between the Certificate’s returns and any index returns.
Any material provided to you is intended only for discussion purposes and is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security and should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing inany securities.